Multicontractor multiproject matching optimization for planning modular school construction programs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a practical context of construction management, a number of special contractors are selected to deliver a multiproject program in a definitive time frame. Research has yet to address how well contractors are matched to projects in scheduling and how to evaluate this criterion in scheduling optimization analysis. This research formulates a novel resource scheduling optimization problem termed multicontractor multiproject matching optimization problem (MCMPMO) based on the current practice of planning modular school development programs. The particular goal of MCMPMO is to determine which contractor is a better match for delivering which project in such a way that the program would be completed by available resources in time, resulting in the highest chances of completing the whole program to the satisfaction of all the stakeholders. A bi-objective optimization formulation for MCMPMO is proposed in the application context of planning modular school development programs. A computer program was prototyped to identify a Pareto front of the MCMPMO problem in a case study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it