MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307563253 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.144433

Magnetic interactions in AB-stacked kagome lattices: Magnetic structure, symmetry, and duality

2022· article· en· W4307563253 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Zelenskiy, T. L. Monchesky, M. L. Plumer, B. W. Southern

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMemorial University of NewfoundlandDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsDuality (order theory)Lattice (music)Condensed matter physicsSymmetry (geometry)AnisotropyMagnetic momentFrustrationMagnetic anisotropyMagnetic structureQuantum mechanicsMagnetizationMagnetic fieldGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic compounds that combine the effects of geometric frustration and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) often host exotic magnetic phases. In many cases, anisotropic lattice-dependent interactions that originate from the SOC significantly reduce the symmetry of the system and constrain the magnetic moments to specific orientations. Using numerical simulations and symmetry analysis, this study demonstrates that, in compounds with the $A\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}B$-stacked kagome layer structure, the anisotropy gives rise to a large number of duality transformations that provide exact mappings between the properties of distinct magnetic phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207