MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307568971 · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100436

The Second Asia-Oceania Human Proteome Organization (AOHUPO) Online Education Series on the Renaissance of Clinical Proteomics: Biomarkers, Imaging and Therapeutics

2022· article· en· W4307568971 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Teck Yew Low, Yu‐Ju Chen, Yasushi Ishihama, M.C.M. Chung, Stuart J. Cordwell, Terence Chuen Wai Poon, Ho Jeong Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYonsei UniversityMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research FoundationNational Research Foundation of KoreaSCIEX
KeywordsThe RenaissanceEvent (particle physics)ProteomeTheme (computing)Kuala lumpurProteomicsLibrary scienceMedical educationPolitical scienceMedicineHistoryComputer scienceBioinformaticsBiologyWorld Wide WebArt historyGeneticsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2021, the Asia-Oceania Human Proteome Organization (AOHUPO) initiated a new endeavor named the AOHUPO Online Education Series with the aim to promote scientific education and collaboration, exchange of ideas and culture among the young scientists in the AO region. Following the warm participation, the AOHUPO organized the second series in 2022, with the theme "The Renaissance of Clinical Proteomics: Biomarkers, Imaging and Therapeutics". This time, the second AOHUPO Online Education Series was hosted by the UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI) affiliated to the National University of Malaysia (UKM) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on three consecutive Fridays (11th, 18th and 25th of March). More than 300 participants coming from 29 countries/regions registered for this 3-days event. This event provided an amalgamation of six prominent speakers and all participants whose interests lay mainly in applying MS-based and non-MS-based proteomics for clinical investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular & Cellular ProteomicsSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207