MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307627565 · doi:10.1080/11926422.2022.2118140

Should Canada join a climate club?

2022· article· en· W4307627565 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Precht

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Foreign Policy Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicClimate Change Policy and Economics
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubKyoto ProtocolClimate changePolitical scienceIncentiveJoin (topology)Collective actionConference of the partiesEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEnvironmental scienceEconomicsPoliticsEcologyLawMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is a global problem and beyond the ability of any single country to meaningfully address. To do so requires collective action, and efforts to date to mobilize such actions have failed (e.g., the 1997 Kyoto Protocol) or been less successful than needed (e.g., the 2015 Paris Agreement). The growing concentration of carbon emissions in the atmosphere increases the urgency of successful actions. The concept of a climate club has been advanced as a mechanism to provide both the incentive and the discipline to collectively address climate change. Canada has recently been invited to participate in a climate club. Is this initiative worthwhile for Canada to participate in?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Foreign Policy JournalSame topicClimate Change Policy and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207