Excitable dynamics in a molecularly-explicit model of cell motility: Mixed-mode oscillations and beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mesenchymal cell motility is mainly regulated by two members of the Rho-family of GTPases, called Rac and Rho. The mutual inhibition exerted by these two proteins on each other’s activation and the promotion of Rac activation by an adaptor protein called paxillin have been implicated in driving cellular polarization comprised of front (high active Rac) and back (high active Rho) during cell migration. Mathematical modeling of this regulatory network has previously shown that bistability is responsible for generating a spatiotemporal pattern underscoring cellular polarity called wave-pinning when diffusion is included. We previously developed a 6D reaction-diffusion model of this network to decipher the role of Rac, Rho and paxillin (along with other auxiliary proteins) in generating wave-pinning. In this study, we simplify this model through a series of steps into an excitable 3D ODE model comprised of one fast variable (the scaled concentration of active Rac), one slow variable (the maximum paxillin phosphorylation rate – turned into a variable) and a very slow variable (a recovery rate – also turned into a variable). We then explore, through slow-fast analysis, how excitability is manifested by showing that the model can exhibit relaxation oscillations (ROs) as well as mixed-mode oscillations (MMOs) whose underlying dynamics are consistent with a delayed Hopf bifurcation. By reintroducing diffusion and the scaled concentration of inactive Rac into the model, we obtain a 4D PDE model that generates several unique spatiotemporal patterns that are relevant to cell motility. These patterns are then characterized and their impact on cell motility are explored by employing the cellular potts model (CPM). Our results reveal that wave pinning produces purely very directed motion in CPM, while MMOs allow for meandering and non-motile behaviours to occur. This highlights the role of MMOs as a potential mechanism for mesenchymal cell motility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".