MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307662222 · doi:10.2118/210815-ms

SPECTRA: A Portal to Combine and Harness the Best Satellite Methane Emissions Data Available to Guide Operators on Their Decarbonization Journey

2022· article· en· W4307662222 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Gauthier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsGHGSat (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethaneSuiteComputer scienceSituation awarenessMethane emissionsAnalyticsSatelliteRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric methaneData analysisData scienceDatabaseData miningEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract GHGSat continues to be the only entity in the world operating satellites dedicated to high-resolution measurements of methane emissions. Every day, GHGSat makes measurements at hundreds of facilities around the world. To optimize the targeting of its satellite observations and turn its measurements into actionable insight, GHGSat developed in-house expertise in ingesting and analyzing other relevant and complementary streams of data such as public satellites and databases of information. In the Spring of 2021, GHGSat released SPECTRA, an ESRI ArcGIS-based portal to facilitate the navigation and interpretation of its high-resolution measurements and analytics layers. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how GHGSat proprietary data, in combination with an innovative analytical suite, can provide situational awareness on methane emissions to operators in the regions where they operate assets and provide opportunities to mitigate them. The data analytics package under SPECTRA incorporates data and algorithms capable of providing insights into the constantly evolving O&G infrastructure. By looking at all data available, from coarse resolution regional methane concentration data to high-resolution methane measurements at facilities, from flaring data to production databases, SPECTRA provides insight on possible precursors of emission events by examining trends and patterns in the data. This paper will present results of methane emissions plumes identified with GHSGat's constellation of satellites, as well as data examples gathered with other platforms such as Sentinel 5P and Sentinel 2. The compatibility and complementarity of the different satellite platforms will be discussed, as will the ability to use low-resolution enhancements to target GHGSat's high-resolution satellite observations to identify and characterize the source of the localized higher concentration. The ability to toggle various layers of information in SPECTRA will be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→