MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307680815 · doi:10.1177/01492063221126490

A Multidimensional Framework for Examining the Effects of Social Class on Organizational Behavior

2022· article· en· W4307680815 on OpenAlex
Stéphane Côté

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Organizational behaviorIntersectionalitySocial psychologySocial classPsychologySociologyEpistemologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of social class in organizations is a fledgling area of research that is revealing important insights into the causes of organizational behavior and workplace outcomes. To extend pioneering studies of social class and organizational behavior, I first highlight the importance of considering multiple dimensions in theorizing about the effects of social class on organizational behavior. I then develop a framework to guide theorizing on how multiple dimensions of social class influence organizational behavior. The framework describes how dimensions of social class may have unique linear effects as well as interactive effects on behavior and identifies candidate mechanisms underlying each type of effect. I end by identifying important areas for future inquiry—the visibility of social class dimensions and intersectionality with other demographic characteristics—to achieve a more precise understanding of how social class influences employee attitudes, performance, and outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it