Monte Carlo Simulations for the Estimation of the Effective Permeability of Mixed-Matrix Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have seen the explosive development of mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) for a myriad of applications. In gas separation, it is desired to concurrently enhance the permeability, selectivity and physicochemical properties of the membrane. To help achieving these objectives, experimental characterization and predictive models can be used synergistically. In this investigation, a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm is proposed to rapidly and accurately estimate the relative permeability of ideal MMMs over a wide range of conditions. The difference in diffusivity coefficients between the polymer matrix and the filler particle is used to adjust the random progression of the migrating species inside each phase. The solubility coefficients of both phases at the polymer−filler interface are used to control the migration of molecules from one phase to the other in a way to achieve progressively phase equilibrium at the interface. Results for various MMMs were compared with the results obtained with the finite difference method under identical conditions, where the results from the finite difference method are used in this investigation as the benchmark method to test the accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm. Results were found to be very accurate (in general, <1% error) over a wide range of polymer and filler characteristics. The MC algorithm is simple and swift to implement and provides an accurate estimation of the relative permeability of ideal MMMs. The MC method can easily be extended to investigate more readily non-ideal MMMs with particle agglomeration, interfacial void, polymer-chain rigidification and/or pore blockage, and MMMs with any filler geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".