New insights into phosphorus biphilicity: Stereochemistry of monocyclic aminophosphoranes formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Oxidative addition of aliphatic amine on monocyclic 2‐R‐1,3,2‐dioxaphospholane (R = methyl or phenyl) leading to phosphoranes bearing a PH axial bond was investigated using a combined theoretical and experimental approach. The reaction followed first order kinetics for both reactants. The activation parameters were consistent with a concerted mechanism exhibiting stereo, enantio, and regio specificities. Systematic density functional theory studies including reactivity descriptors, structural parameters, determination of all possible phosphorane isomers, their transition states and their formation mechanisms were carried out to delineate the reaction pathway. Depending on the nature of the atom in the final apical position (H, N of the amine, or C of the methyl), three types of phosphoranes were identified. Energy profiles, using the intrinsic reaction coordinate technique for the formation of each isomer, were established. It was shown that the phosphorus biphilicity acts in three consecutive sequences, namely nitrogen nucleophilic attack leading to a supermolecule structure, nucleophilic behavior of phosphorus in the transition state zone of influence, and electrophilic approach of the nitrogen atom to complete the reaction. Phosphorane with an equatorial PH bond was found to be a kinetic product that transforms rapidly to the thermodynamically stable isomer with axial PH via two consecutive Berry pseudo‐rotations. A new tool, referred to reactive internal reaction coordinates, was introduced to represent the reaction path more clearly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".