MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307742220 · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2022.100581

Using dual mutation particle swarm method to optimize the variable cross-section of a thermoelectric generator based on a comprehensive thermodynamic model

2022· article· en· W4307742220 on OpenAlexafffund
Xi Wang, Paul Henshaw, David S.‐K. Ting

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Engineering and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThermoelectric generatorParticle swarm optimizationComputer sciencePower (physics)Generator (circuit theory)Dual (grammatical number)Variable (mathematics)Cross section (physics)Mathematical optimizationThermoelectric effectApplied mathematicsMathematicsAlgorithmThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shape design for a thermoelectric generator (TEG) plays an important role in its performance. In this paper, a hyperbolic function was introduced to design a variable cross-section TEG module to optimize the configuration for maximum power generation and efficiency was sought. A comprehensive thermodynamic model was applied to establish the governing equations for the newly designed TEG module. The mutation particle swarm optimization (MPSO) method was invoked to solve the thermodynamic model. The thermodynamic model's output results include the temperatures at both ends of the TE element, thus making it possible to evaluate the actual performance of the TEG module. The results indicate that both the power generation and efficiency of the hyperbolic TEG are superior to those obtained based on a traditional design. The studies also disclosed that the hyperbolic structure can increase the thermal resistance of the TE couple making it possible to enlarge the temperature difference. This is the main mechanism to improve the performance of a hyperbolic TEG. Besides, the four non-dimensional parameters (shape parameter (β), area ratio (μ), temperature ratio (θ), and resistance ratio (rx)) related to the geometric structure and working conditions have notable effects on the TEG performance. It is thus worthwhile optimizing the TEG power generation and efficiency in the variable searching space of these parameters. However, differing from the traditional optimization, it is necessary to solve the governing equations in every iteration when searching for an optimal configuration based on the comprehensive model. In order to overcome the challenge, the Dual-MPSO algorithm was used in this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCleaner Engineering and TechnologySame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207