MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307795053 · doi:10.2172/1155043

IR Heat Treatment of Hybrid Steel-Al Joints

2014· report· en· W4307795053 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas R. Watkins, Adrian S. Sabau, Donald Erdman, Gerard M. Ludtka, Brian D. Murphy, P. C. Joshi, Hebi Yin, Wei Zhang, Tim Skszek, X. Niu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMagna International (Canada)
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of Energy EfficiencyBasic Energy SciencesUT-BattelleBattelle
KeywordsResidual stressMaterials scienceJoint (building)Stress (linguistics)Heat fluxComposite materialNuclear engineeringHeat transferMetallurgyStructural engineeringThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The technical objective of this CRADA is to develop and model a heat treatment process based on Infra- Red (IR) heating of a overcast Al/steel bimetallic joint to produce a T5 temper in a shorter period of time than is currently achievable and, separately, to produce a modified T6 temper for improved mechanical properties without the loss of joint integrity. IR heat treatments have been demonstrated to provide reduced processing time, reduced energy requirements, and improved material properties of Al components, including strength and elongation, relative to convective thermal heat treatment methods. A prototype IR furnace was assembled to heat treat these joints. The residual stress state of the joints were modeled in the as-cast condition, as well as the T5 and T6 condition. Neutrons were used to measure the residual stresses in the joints for various heat treatments. ORNL is uniquely equipped to partner with Vehma in the experimental evaluation and modeling of Al/steel bi-metallic joints. ORNL possesses a long history of microstructural, crystallographic and mechanical characterization of structural materials. Unique facilities at ORNL for this work include the NRSF2/HB-2B beamline at the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) for residual stress measurements with neutron diffraction, metallurgical expertise for heat treating and modeling capability of the manufacturing of these joints for residual stress prediction. All of these capabilities were utilized in this CRADA. The CRADA began in April 2011 and ended in September 2014 (41 months).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207