MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307854591 · doi:10.4000/nrt.12747

Qu’est devenu le modèle québécois de relations professionnelles ?

2022· article· fr· W4307854591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Collombat, Martine D’Amours

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le modèle québécois de relations professionnelles mis en place à partir des années 1960 a permis la consolidation du syndicalisme tant dans les milieux de travail que sur le plan politique. Les salariés ont obtenu des gains par la négociation collective et les syndicats ont acquis un statut d’interlocuteur politique privilégié. À compter des années 1980, les transformations du capitalisme ont dégradé les relations d’emploi et contribué à freiner la syndicalisation. Les syndicats ont aussi perdu de leur influence auprès de l’État. Les avancées obtenues par les salariés s’appuient sur la protection de droits individuels ou sur des luttes menées par d’autres mouvements sociaux. Cette situation interroge donc les stratégies politiques du syndicalisme et sa capacité à représenter la diversité du salariat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207