Analytical profile of the lysergamide 1cP‐AL‐LAD and detection of impurities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The development of novel lysergamides continues to occur, based on both the needs of psychedelic medicine and commercial interest in new recreational substances. The present study continues the authors' research on novel lysergamides and describes the analytical profile of 1‐cyclopropanoyl‐AL‐LAD (IUPAC name: 1‐(cyclopropanecarbonyl)‐ N , N ‐diethyl‐6‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)‐9,10‐didehydroergoline‐8β‐carboxamide; 1cP‐AL‐LAD), using various chromatographic, mass spectrometric, and spectroscopic methods. Analysis of a powdered sample of 1cP‐AL‐LAD, obtained from an online vendor, by high performance liquid chromatography‐electrospray ionization‐quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry in full scan/AutoMS/MS mode revealed the detection of 17 impurities based on high‐resolution tandem mass spectral data; tentative determination of their identity was based on mass spectral grounds alone, though detection of AL‐LAD and 1P‐AL‐LAD was confirmed using available reference standards. Other tentative compound identifications included 1‐acetyl‐AL‐LAD and several other substances potentially reflecting oxidation of the N 6 ‐allyl group as well as other positions on the ergoline ring system. These data may assist those interested in the chemistry of lysergamides. Finally, 1cP‐AL‐LAD was also detected in samples of “blotters” sold online for recreational use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".