Predicting histopathology markers of endometrial carcinoma with a quantitative image analysis approach based on spherical harmonics in multiparametric MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Identifying optimal machine learning pipelines for computer-aided diagnosis is key for the development of robust, reproducible, and clinically relevant imaging biomarkers for endometrial carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to introduce the mathematical development of image descriptors computed from spherical harmonics (SPHARM) decompositions as well as the associated machine learning pipeline, and to evaluate their performance in predicting deep myometrial invasion (MI) and histopathological high-grade in preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 128 women with histopathology-confirmed endometrial carcinomas who underwent 1.5-T MRI before hysterectomy between January 2011 and July 2015. SPHARM descriptors of each tumor were computed on multiparametric MRI images (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps). Tensor-based logistic regression was used to classify two-dimensional SPHARM rotationally-invariant descriptors. Head-to-head comparisons with radiomics analyses were performed with DeLong tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction to compare diagnostic performances. RESULTS: With all MRI contrasts, SPHARM analysis resulted in area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy values of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 1.00), 100% (95% CI: 100, 100), 74% (95% CI: 51, 92), 87% (95% CI: 78, 98), respectively, for predicting deep MI. For predicting high-grade tumor histology, the corresponding values for the same diagnostic metrics were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.90), 93% (95% CI: 67, 100), 63% (95% CI: 45, 79) and 78% (95% CI: 64, 86). The corresponding values achieved via radiomics were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.95), 82% (95% CI: 65, 93), 80% (95% CI: 51, 94), 81% (95% CI: 70, 91) for deep MI and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.83), 93% (95% CI: 65, 100), 55% (95% CI: 41, 69), 74% (95% CI: 52, 88) for high-grade histology. The diagnostic performance of the SPHARM analysis was not significantly different (P = 0.62) from that of radiomics for predicting deep MI but was significantly higher (P = 0.044) for predicting high-grade histology. CONCLUSION: The proposed SPHARM analysis yields similar or higher diagnostic performance than radiomics in identifying deep MI and high-grade status in histology-proven endometrial carcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".