MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307921178 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.08310

Strong-majority bootstrap percolation on regular graphs with low\n dissemination threshold

2015· preprint· W4307921178 on OpenAlexaff
Dieter Mitsche, Xavier Pérez‐Giménez, Paweł Prałat

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsConjectureVertex (graph theory)MathematicsGraphInteger (computer science)Percolation (cognitive psychology)Discrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the following model of strong-majority bootstrap percolation on a\ngraph. Let r be some positive integer, and p in [0,1]. Initially, every vertex\nis active with probability p, independently from all other vertices. Then, at\nevery step of the process, each vertex v of degree deg(v) becomes active if at\nleast (deg(v)+r)/2 of its neighbours are active. Given any arbitrarily small\np>0 and any integer r, we construct a family of d=d(p,r)-regular graphs such\nthat with high probability all vertices become active in the end. In\nparticular, the case r=1 answers a question and disproves a conjecture of\nRapaport, Suchan, Todinca, and Verstraete (Algorithmica, 2011).\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207