Impact direct et à long terme du changement climatique sur le développement des arbres : conséquences sur la santé, la productivité et la mortalité des forêts. Rapport Final du projet CFQCU n°2013-03
Bibliographic record
Abstract
/ Le projet CFQCU a fait émerger dans son domaine une coopération bilatérale franco-québécoise durable : il se traduit par (1) des projets de recherche à long terme au Québec directement issus du programme CFQCU, (2) une association dans des projets pluriannuels soumis à appels d'offres en France et en Europe (3) des co-encadrements d'étudiants dont une thèse en cours, (4) des travaux communs à venir lors d'un sabbatique de la responsable québécoise, (5) des publications et communications communes en partie réalisées, et en partie programmées à court terme.\nLe projet CFQCU a joué un rôle significatif de déclencheur et d'entraînement pour l'obtention d'autres financements et la formalisation de coopérations internationales beaucoup plus larges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".