MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307933135 · doi:10.32920/21288231.v1

Multidimensional fetal flow imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a feasibility study

2022· preprint· en· W4307933135 on OpenAlexafffund
Datta Singh Goolaub, Christopher Roy, Eric Schrauben, Dafna Sussman, Davide Marini, Mike Seed, Christopher K. Macgowan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversitySt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGatingMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsPulse sequenceMathematicsMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Purpose: To image multidimensional flow in fetuses using golden-angle radial phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC-CMR) with motion correction and retrospective gating.</p> <p>Methods: A novel PC-CMR method was developed using an ungated golden-angle radial acquisition with continuously incremented velocity encoding. Healthy subjects (n=5, 27 +/- 3 years, males) and pregnant females (n=5, 34 +/- 2 weeks gestation) were imaged at 3T using the proposed sequence. Real-time reconstructions were first performed for retrospective motion correction and cardiac gating (using metric optimized gating, MOG). CINE reconstructions of multidimensional flow were then performed using the corrected and gated data.</p> <p>Results: In adults, flows obtained using the proposed method agreed strongly with those obtained using a conventionally gated Cartesian acquisition. Across the five adults, bias and limits of agreement were -1.0 cm/s and [-5.1, 3.2] cm/s for mean velocities and -1.1 cm/s and [-6.5, 4.3] cm/s for peak velocities. Temporal correlation between corresponding waveforms was also high (R similar to 0.98). Calculated timing errors between MOG and pulse-gating RR intervals were low (similar to 20 ms). First insights into multidimensional fetal blood flows were achieved. Inter-subject consistency in fetal descending aortic flows (n=3) was strong with an average velocity of 27.1 +/- 0.4 cm/s, peak systolic velocity of 70.0 +/- 1.8 cm/s and an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.95 between the velocity waveforms. In one fetal case, high flow waveform reproducibility was demonstrated in the ascending aorta (R = 0.97) and main pulmonary artery (R = 0.99).</p> <p>Conclusion: Multidimensional PC-CMR of fetal flow was developed and validated, incorporating retrospective motion compensation and cardiac gating. Using this method, the first quantification and visualization of multidimensional fetal blood flow was achieved using CMR.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207