EVOLUTION OF FORMATION OF HOTEL AREAS IN THE CITIES OF WESTERN EUROPE XVIІІ ‒ EARLY XX CENTURIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the research, the urban development aspect of hotel areas in the context of severe urban changes that took place in the cities of Western Europe during the XVIIІ - early XX centuries were analyzed. It was investigated how due to external factors of influence new composite forms of the location of hotels in urban areas were formed and more modern algorithms of interaction between current urban planning realities and the formation of new, improved functional and planning proposals in the design, construction and operation of European hotels were formed in the second half of the XIX – early XX century. The scale of evolutionary changes has been constructed during this historical period and the main stages of the formation of the hotel industry in Europe have been studied. Four main compositional variants of urban areas were discovered, in which the hotels of that time were built: the frontal site, through the section, located on the corner and the hotel quarter. The prevailing forms of the location of hotels in these areas in the urban environment were analyzed, as well as the external factors of influence not only on the change of the urban construction concept were investigated, but also on the emergence of new architectural and planning decisions, which in their basic structure have survived to this day almost unchanged. Among the main features of the development of urban development, it should be noted the active development of the area of the former economic yard, which functionally began to be used directly by the hotel itself. This philosophy of increasing the room number and profitability of the institution has led to a gradual complication of the composite component and to the complete development of the hotel area with the selection of one or more internal atriums that were involved in separate public spaces and hotel areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".