MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307983220 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9235

Millimeter Dust Emission and Planetary Dynamics in the HD 106906 System

2022· article· en· W4307983220 on OpenAlexaff
Anna J. Fehr, A. Meredith Hughes, Rebekah I. Dawson, Rachel E. Marino, Matan Ackelsberg, Jamar Kittling, Kevin Flaherty, Erika Nesvold, John M. Carpenter, Sean M. Andrews, Brenda C. Matthews, Katie A. Crotts, Paul Kalas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanNational Institutes of Natural SciencesConnecticut Space Grant College ConsortiumNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsDebris diskPlanetesimalPlanetAstrophysicsAstronomyOrbital eccentricityPlanetary systemSubmillimeter ArrayMillimeterProtoplanetary diskCircumstellar dustCircumbinary planetCircular orbitThick diskEccentricity (behavior)StarsStar formationGalaxyHalo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Debris disks are dusty, optically thin structures around main-sequence stars. HD 106906AB is a short-period stellar binary, host to a wide-separation planet, HD 106906b, and a debris disk. Only a few known systems include a debris disk and a directly imaged planet, and HD 106906 is the only one in which the planet is exterior to the disk. The debris disk is edge-on and highly asymmetric in scattered light. Here we resolve the disk structure at a resolution of 0.″38 (39 au) with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) at a wavelength of 1.3 mm. We model the disk with both a narrow and broad ring of material, and find that a radially broad, axisymmetric disk between radii of ∼50–100 au is able to capture the structure of the observations without evidence of any asymmetry or eccentricity, other than a tentative stellocentric offset. We place stringent upper limits on both the gas and dust contents of a putative circumplanetary disk. We interpret the ALMA data in concert with scattered-light observations of the inner ring and astrometric constraints on the planet’s orbit, and find that the observations are consistent with a large-separation, low-eccentricity orbit for the planet. A dynamical analysis indicates that the central binary can efficiently stabilize planetesimal orbits interior to ∼100 au, which somewhat relaxes the constraints on the eccentricity and semimajor axis. The observational constraints are consistent with in-situ formation via gravitational instability but cannot rule out a scattering event as the origin for HD 106906b’s current orbit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→