Investigating the effect of the mean path length on reluctance actuator output force characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of the flux's mean path length (MPL) on the reluctance actuator's analytical model. It determines the circumstances where the model neglecting the MPL is valid. The analysis is carried out for both C-Core and E-Core reluctance actuators; the analytical results are calculated by using MATrix LABoratory and then validated against a finite element model simulation by using COMputer SOLution Multiphysics. In addition, the experimental results of the magnetic force of C-Core and E-Core reluctance actuators are presented and compared with the analytical model. The comparison is obtained under different input currents and air gaps for two different ferromagnetic materials. It can be concluded that the analytical model is valid only for air gaps with a relatively high air gap displacement and for small air gaps, considering the MPL is necessary for accurate results. This means that whenever the reluctance actuator is proposed for high-precision motion system applications, it is essential that the analysis takes into account the effect of the MPL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".