MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307988648 · doi:10.32920/21428706.v1

Ramanujan Sums for Image Pattern Analysis

2022· preprint· en· W4307988648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Ramanujan's sumPattern recognition (psychology)WaveletComplex wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAlgorithmZernike polynomialsScalingTranslation (biology)White noiseImage processingImage (mathematics)Computer scienceWavelet transformCombinatoricsDiscrete wavelet transformGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Ramanujan sums (RS) have been found to be very successful in signal processing recently. However, as far as we know, the RS have not been applied to image analysis. In this paper, we propose two novel algorithms for image analysis, including moment invariants and pattern recognition. Our algorithms are invariant to the translation, rotation and scaling of the 2D shapes. The RS are robust to Gaussian white noise and occlusion as well. Our algorithms compare favourably to the dual-tree complex wavelet (DTCWT) moments and the Zernike’s moments in terms of correct classification rates for three well-known shape datasets. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFractal and DNA sequence analysisFrench-language works237,207