Low Sampling-rate Approach for ECG Signals with Compressed Sensing Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p> </p> <p>Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) consist of tiny Biomedical Wireless Sensors (BWSs) and a Gate Way (GW) to connect to the external databases in the hospital and medical centres. The GW could connect the BWSs, to a range of wireless telecomnumication networks. These wireless telecommunication networks could be either a mobile phone network, a standard telephone network a dedicated medical centre or using public Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) nodes also known a Wi-Fi system. The electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are widely used in health care systems because they are non-invasive mechanisms to establish medical diagnosis of heart diseases. The current ECG systems suffer from important limitations: limited patient's mobility, limited energy, limited on wireless applications. The main drawback of current EGG systems is the location-specific nature of the systems due to the use of fixed/wired applications. That is why; there is a critical need to improve the current ECG systems to cover security handling and to achieve extended patient's mobility. With this in mind, Compressed Sensing (CS) procedure and the collaboration of Block Sparse Bayesian Learning (BSBL) framework is used to provide a robust low sampling-rate approach for normal and abnormal ECG signals. Advanced WBANs based on our approach will be able to deliver healthcare not only to patients in hospital and medical centres; but also in their homes and workplaces thus offering cost saving, and improving the quality of life. Our simulation results based on two proposed algorithms illustrate 15% incensement of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and a good level of quality for the degree of incoherence between the random measurement and sparsity matrices.</p> <p> </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".