MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308002692 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21431889.v1

Smart Network Intrusion Detection System for Cyber Security of Industrial IoT

2022· preprint· en· W4308002692 on OpenAlexaff
Hardik Gunjal, Preetkumar Patel, Dr Dariush Ebrahimi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersUniversity of New South Wales
KeywordsSCADAComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemIndustrial control systemDeep learningConvolutional neural networkPerceptronCritical infrastructureArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkInternet of ThingsReal-time computingEmbedded systemComputer networkComputer securityControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The industrial sector has been making use of machines and sensors having the capability to communicate with each other. This forms a network of Industrial devices which is called Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). IIoT is an emerging trend that can generate a huge amount of data that is vulnerable to cyber-attacks. In IIoT network, data and control instructions flow through Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. A Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) which can monitor realtime network traffic could be deployed between SCADA and the IIoT devices to detect cyber-attacks. NIDS with Deep Learning (DL) algorithms require large dataset for which CSE-CIC-IDS2018 and UNSW-NB15 dataset is used. The paper compares a Multi-Layer Perceptron(MLP), a Fully Connected Deep Neural Network (FCNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 and UNSW-NB15 with XGBoost for feature selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207