How a New Glacial History Paradigm Explains Northeast Alabama’s Tennessee River-Gulf of Mexico Drainage Divide Area Topographic Map Drainage System Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new and fundamentally different glacial history paradigm (developed by using Missouri River drainage basin topographic map evidence) is tested by using topographic map drainage system and erosional landform evidence located along and near the northeast Alabama Tennessee River-Gulf of Mexico drainage divide (Tennessee Valley Divide). The new paradigm describes a thick North American continental ice sheet (located where continental ice sheets are usually reported to have been) which was erosive and heavy enough to create and occupy a deep “hole” and which produced massive meltwater floods which first flowed across the deep “hole’s” rising southern rim and which were subsequently forced by deep “hole” rim uplift to flow inside the deep “hole” rim and finally to flow northward into the deep “hole” itself. Northeast Alabama topographic map evidence including divide crossings (low points along drainage divides), barbed tributaries, and other unusual drainage features verify new paradigm predictions that large and prolonged south-oriented floods first flowed across the northeast Alabama Tennessee Valley Divide (which was a segment of the new paradigm’s deep “hole” southern rim) and were subsequently diverted along the rising deep “hole” rim and finally reversed to reach the Mississippi River valley (which became the deep “hole’s” only remaining southern exit) and to form what is today the southwest-, northwest-, and north-oriented Tennessee River.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".