BACURAU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensaio discute a realidade das cidades pequenas tal qual representada no filme Bacurau. A questão posta como problema é como essas imagens em movimento nos convidam a refletir a partir de uma perspectiva estética e política. Essa obra nos instiga a pensar o urbano a partir de uma outra perspectiva — a cidade pequena ou, ainda, o lugar menor. Em contextos contra-hegemônicos, se justificam reflexões que invertam a lógica hegemônica neoliberal. O objetivo é pensar pautas que emergem no filme em questão que expressam realidades das cidades pequenas. A aproximação metodológica reside no enfrentamento teórico a partir das noções de estética e política em Jacques Rancière e na noção de menor em Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari. Esperamos alçar questões que evidenciam a realidade desse outro urbano. Acreditamos que é na esfera estética e política que esse outro urbano possa se manifestar como uma questão relevante de pesquisa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".