Geothermometric constraints on the thermal architecture, metamorphism, and exhumation of the Northern Range, Trinidad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Northern Range of Trinidad is composed of Mesozoic passive margin sedimentary rocks that underwent ductile deformation and subgreenschist‐ to greenschist‐facies metamorphism in the early Miocene. Previous studies suggested a two‐stage formation of the Northern Range between the Caribbean and South American plates: an initial collision drove mountain building in the Miocene and subsequent strike‐slip plate motion preferentially exhumed the western segment, producing a westward increase in the metamorphic thermal gradient. However, these studies were not able to resolve whether this gradient was discrete or continuous so the tectonic model awaits testing. In this study we use Raman spectroscopy on carbonaceous material (RSCM), an empirical geothermometer, to constrain peak temperatures across the Northern Range with a greater resolution than was available in previous studies. The RSCM temperatures show an abrupt increase from 337°C ± 10°C in the east to 442°C ± 16°C west of Chupara Point, where a range‐cutting fault (Chupara Fault) had been inferred in previous geologic mapping campaigns. Thus, the discrete thermal discontinuity of ~100°C very likely represents the Chupara Fault. Our RSCM‐derived peak metamorphic temperatures are 50°C to 100°C higher than those from previous estimates, requiring revision of tectonic models to account for deeper burial and greater exhumation. The peak metamorphic conditions determined here, and the deduced timing of faulting from published thermochronological data, are consistent with the two‐stage tectonic model proposed in previous studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".