AQUA: Scalable Rowhammer Mitigation by Quarantining Aggressor Rows at Runtime
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rowhammer allows an attacker to induce bit flips in a row by rapidly accessing neighboring rows. Rowhammer is a severe security threat as it can be used to escalate privilege or break confidentiality. Moreover, the threshold of activations needed to induce Rowhammer continues to reduce and new attacks like Half-Double break existing solutions that refresh victim rows. The recently proposed Randomized Row-Swap (RRS) scheme is resilient to Half-Double as it provides mitigation by swapping an aggressor row with a random row. However, to ensure security, the threshold for triggering a row-swap must be set much lower than the Rowhammer threshold, leading to a significant performance loss of 20% on average, at a Rowhammer threshold of 1K. Furthermore, the SRAM overhead for storing the indirection table of RRS becomes prohibitively large – 2.4MB per rank at a Rowhammer threshold of 1K. Our goal is to develop a scalable Rowhammer mitigation that incurs negligible performance and storage overheads.To this end, we propose AQUA, a Rowhammer mitigation that breaks the spatial correlation between aggressor and victim rows by dynamically quarantining the aggressor row in a dedicated region of memory. AQUA allows for an effective row migration threshold much higher than in RRS, leading to an order of magnitude less slowdown and SRAM. As the security of AQUA is not reliant on keeping the destination row a secret, we further reduce the SRAM overheads of the indirection table by storing it in DRAM, and accessing it on-demand. We derive the size of the quarantine region required to ensure security for AQUA and show that reserving about 1% of DRAM is sufficient to mitigate Rowhammer at a threshold of 1K. Our evaluations show that AQUA incurs an average slowdown of 2% and an SRAM overhead (for mapping and migration) of only 41KB per rank at a Rowhammer threshold of 1K.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".