MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308083834 · doi:10.1109/micro56248.2022.00039

ALTOCUMULUS: Scalable Scheduling for Nanosecond-Scale Remote Procedure Calls

2022· article· en· W4308083834 on OpenAlexaff
Jiechen Zhao, Iris Uwizeyimana, Karthik Ganesan, Mark C. Jeffrey, Natalie Enright Jerger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Engineering Research Council
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityScheduling (production processes)NanosecondScale (ratio)Operating systemEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Online services in modern datacenters use Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) to communicate between different software layers. Despite RPCs using just a few small functions, inefficient RPC handling can cause delays to propagate across the system and degrade end-to-end performance. Prior work has reduced RPC processing time to less than 1 $\mu$ s, which now shifts the bottleneck to the scheduling of RPCs. Existing RPC schedulers suffer from either high overheads, inability to effectively utilize high core-count CPUs or do not adaptively fit different traffic patterns. To address these shortcomings, we present ALTOCUMULUS, <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> a scalable, software-hardware codesign to schedule RPCs at nanosecond scales. ALTOCUMULUS provides a proactive scheduling scheme and low-overhead messaging mechanism on top of a decentralized user runtime. ALTOCUMULUS also offers direct access from the user space to a set of simple hardware primitives to quickly migrate long-latency RPCs. We evaluate ALTOCUMULUS with synthetic workloads and an end-to-end in-memory key-value store application under real-world traffic patterns. ALTOCUMULUS improves throughput by 1.3-24.6$\times$ under a 99 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> percentile latency <300$\mu$ s and reduces tail latency by up to 15.8$\times$ on 16-core systems over current state-of-the-art software and hardware schedulers. For 256-core systems, integrating ALTOCUMULUS with either a hardware-optimized NIC or commodity PCIe NIC can improve throughput by $ 2.8\times$ or $ 2.7\times$, respectively, under 99 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> percentile latency $\lt 8.5\mu \mathrm{s}$. <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> Automatic Concurrent Migration Load-balancing Strategy (AutoCuMuLuS), homophonic with “altocumulus” as a type of clouds in meteorology, fragmented to separate patches or nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207