MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy Analysis in Single Cluster WSNs with Power Control and In-network Data Compression

2022· article· en· W4308090766 on OpenAlexaff
Dajiang Li, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceAttenuationSink (geography)DissipationTopology (electrical circuits)Real-time computingPhysicsComputer networkElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytical expressions for the energy associated with data collection in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is an important tool when operating integrated sensing and transmitting devices constrained by limited battery life-time. This paper develops a new method of finding the energy dissipated by sensors due to (i) variable times associated with the transmission of in-network compressed data and (ii) transmit power adjusted to overcome deterministic attenuation of signals with distance in various radio propagation environments. Specifically, semi-analytic expressions are derived for energy associated with data aggregation and communication when sensor nodes send data to a single cluster head (sink) located at the origin and assuming that sensors are distributed within the cluster according to a two dimensional (2-D) Poisson point process. The compressed representations of the sensed phenomenon at various nodes in the system exploit spatial correlation among sensor measurements and, similarly as transmit powers, are dependent on the distances between nodes and the sink. The starting point for the analysis is the observation that node distances to the sink form a gamma distribution. By using this model, the dissipated energy is derived by finding the fractional moments of the gamma distribution. With sensors distributed randomly in a plane, close agreement is found between the calculated and simulated results for dissipated energies in different propagation and sensing conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207