MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating the Impact of Increasing Renewable Energy Penetration Levels on the Accuracy of Net Load Forecasting

2022· article· en· W4308090797 on OpenAlexaff
Gamal Aburiyana, Hamed H. Aly, Timothy Little

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemPenetration (warfare)Environmental economicsElectricityWind powerElectric power systemRenewable resourceEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePower (physics)EngineeringEconomicsElectrical engineeringOperations research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity from renewable resources is growing rapidly and contributing increasingly to the global generated electricity. Renewable energy is known to be sustainable and emissions free. On the other hand, some renewable resources such as wind and solar are intermittent. High penetration levels of such resources will certainly give the net load a fluctuating nature. This would make it difficult for the system operator to maintain the balance between the load demand and the generated power. Taking this into consideration, accurate net load forecasting is crucial. At the same time, the continuously increase in wind and photovoltaic (PV) penetration levels poses a question about the net load behavior and whether its forecasting accuracy would be impacted. This work aims to investigate the effect of the increasing penetration levels of PV and wind power individually and together on the accuracy of net load forecasting for a specific power system and load demand amount.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207