MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transport Service Electrification in Developing Countries

2022· article· en· W4308091346 on OpenAlexaff
Cristian Giovanni Colombo, Alessandro Saldarini, Wahiba Yaïci, Morris Brenna, Michela Longo

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 11th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationPublic transportWork (physics)Transport engineeringDeveloping countryService (business)BusinessEnvironmental economicsElectricitySustainable transportProcess (computing)Sustainable developmentKey (lock)Reliability (semiconductor)EngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Economic growthSustainabilityMarketingEconomicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the new stringent constraints proposed by public authorities, decarbonization became a key trend in the last years. Transport sector still represents one of the most pollutant fragment. Even if several countries start their process of decarbonization through the introduction of several Electric Vehicles in their public services, still, for several countries, especially the developing ones, transportation represents a hard to abate sector, which generally uses outdated and pollutant vehicles, discouraging the use of public transport and facilitating the creation of traffic congestions. Basing on these considerations, this work want to implement a simulation for a public service in a developing country, evaluating if it is possible to perform a long trip using an electric minibus. Therefore, a case study will be implemented highlighting the barriers of the transport electrification in this area, producing results on consumption and reliability of the service. Finally, an environmentally sustainable solution to power the service will be proposed to highlight the potential of electrification in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 11th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA)Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207