MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4308101920 · doi:10.1101/2022.10.29.22281666

Networks and genes modulated by posterior hypothalamic stimulation in patients with aggressive behaviours: Analysis of probabilistic mapping, normative connectomics, and atlas-derived transcriptomics of the largest international multi-centre dataset

2022· preprint· en· W4308101920 on OpenAlexafffund
Flavia Venetucci Gouveia, Jürgen Germann, Gavin J.B. Elias, Alexandre Boutet, Aaron Loh, Adriana Lucia López Ríos, Cristina V. Torres, William Omar Contreras López, Raquel CR Martinez, Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Juan Carlos Benedetti‐Isaac, Peter Giacobbe, Pablo M Arango Pava, Han Yan, George M. Ibrahim, Nir Lipsman, Andrés M. Lozano, Clement Hamani

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook HospitalMental Health Research CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationToronto Rehabilitation InstituteSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversidad Autónoma de BucaramangaHospital Universitario de San Vicente FundaciónFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationNeuroscienceConnectomicsMonoamine neurotransmitterDiffusion MRIMedicinePsychologyBrain mappingConnectomeMagnetic resonance imagingFunctional connectivityInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Deep brain stimulation targeting the posterior hypothalamus (pHyp-DBS) is being investigated as treatment for refractory aggressive behaviour, but its mechanisms of action remain elusive. We conducted an integrated imaging analysis of a large multi-centre dataset, incorporating volume of activated tissue modeling, probabilistic mapping, normative connectomics, and atlas-derived transcriptomics. 91% of the patients responded positively to treatment, with a more striking improvement recorded in the pediatric population. Probabilistic mapping revealed an optimized surgical target within the posterior-inferior-lateral posterior hypothalamic area and normative connectomic analyses identified fiber tracts and interconnected brain areas associated with sensorimotor function, emotional regulation, and monoamine production. Functional connectivity between the target, periaqueductal gray and the amygdala – together with patient age – was highly predictive of treatment outcome. Finally, transcriptomic analysis showed that genes involved in mechanisms of aggressive behaviour, neuronal communication, plasticity and neuroinflammation may underlie this functional network. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study investigated the brain mechanisms associated with symptom improvement following deep brain stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus for severe and refractory aggressive behavior. Conducting an integrated imaging analysis of a large international multi-center dataset of patients treated with hypothalamic deep brain stimulation, we were able to show for the first time that treatment is highly efficacious across various patients with an average improvement greater than 70%. Leveraging this unique dataset allowed us to demonstrate that some patient characteristics are important for treatment success, describe the optimal target zone for maximal benefit, that engagement of distinct fiber tracts and networks within the emotional neurocircuitry are key for positive outcome, and - using imaging transcriptomics - elucidate some potential molecular underpinnings. The provided optimal stimulation site allows for direct clinical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→