Development of a CT-Based Auto-Segmentation Model for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography-Delineated Tubarial Glands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern inverse planning radiotherapy techniques allow for organs at risk (OARs) to evade radiation doses that they would have been subjected to with earlier techniques. The extent to which patient outcomes may be improved using these techniques depends on the delineation accuracy of target volumes and OARs on medical images as well as clinical dose constraints applied to regions of interest (ROIs). The recent discovery of bilateral "tubarial" salivary glands, which were found in the nasopharynx using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET), raises concerns over how dose to this region might affect patient outcomes. The dose response of the major salivary glands is known to be variable, and it is possible that the dose in tubarial glands constitutes a missing variable in the optimization of head and neck (HN) radiotherapy plans. A necessary first step toward conducting clinical studies that include the tubarial glands in plan optimization is to develop methods for delineating these glands without the use of PSMA PET images, as their acquisition is not considered a part of the standard of care for HN patients. In this study, we develop an open-source program, Organogenesis, for the auto-segmentation of tubarial glands using only computed tomography (CT) images. A predictive model is trained using contours derived from PSMA PET images, allowing for accurate delineation of tubarial glands, which cannot be manually contoured using CT only. Organogenesis provides a predictive model for tubarial glands that can be iteratively improved on with additional data, creating a viable pathway to clinical studies that can assess the importance of incorporating tubarial glands into HN radiotherapy plan optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".