MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308120119 · doi:10.3390/cimb44110361

In Silico Identification of Promising New Pyrazole Derivative-Based Small Molecules for Modulating CRMP2, C-RAF, CYP17, VEGFR, C-KIT, and HDAC—Application towards Cancer Therapeutics

2022· review· en· W4308120119 on OpenAlexaff
Fatima Ezzahra Bennani, Khalid Karrouchi, Latifa Doudach, Mario Scrima, Noor Rahman, Luca Rastrelli, Trina Ekawati Tallei, Christopher E. Rudd, My El Abbés Faouzi, M’hammed Ansar

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Issues in Molecular Biology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn silicoPyrazoleIdentification (biology)ChemistryComputational biologyCancer researchBiologyStereochemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite continual efforts being made with multiple clinical studies and deploying cutting-edge diagnostic tools and technologies, the discovery of new cancer therapies remains of severe worldwide concern. Multiple drug resistance has also emerged in several cancer cell types, leaving them unresponsive to the many cancer treatments. Such a condition always prompts the development of next-generation cancer therapies that have a better chance of inhibiting selective target macromolecules with less toxicity. Therefore, in the present study, extensive computational approaches were implemented combining molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies for identifying potent pyrazole-based inhibitors or modulators for CRMP2, C-RAF, CYP17, c-KIT, VEGFR, and HDAC proteins. All of these proteins are in some way linked to the development of numerous forms of cancer, including breast, liver, prostate, kidney, and stomach cancers. In order to identify potential compounds, 63 in-house synthesized pyrazole-derivative compounds were docked with each selected protein. In addition, single or multiple standard drug compounds of each protein were also considered for docking analyses and their results used for comparison purposes. Afterward, based on the binding affinity and interaction profile of pyrazole compounds of each protein, potentially strong compounds were filtered out and further subjected to 1000 ns MD simulation analyses. Analyzing parameters such as RMSD, RMSF, RoG and protein-ligand contact maps were derived from trajectories of simulated protein-ligand complexes. All these parameters turned out to be satisfactory and within the acceptable range to support the structural integrity and interaction stability of the protein-ligand complexes in dynamic state. Comprehensive computational analyses suggested that a few identified pyrazole compounds, such as M33, M36, M72, and M76, could be potential inhibitors or modulators for HDAC, C-RAF, CYP72 and VEGFR proteins, respectively. Another pyrazole compound, M74, turned out to be a very promising dual inhibitor/modulator for CRMP2 and c-KIT proteins. However, more extensive study may be required for further optimization of the selected chemical framework of pyrazole derivatives to yield improved inhibitory activity against each studied protein receptor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Issues in Molecular BiologySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207