Kinetics in DMS: Modeling Clustering and Declustering Reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) uses high-frequency oscillating electrical fields to harness the differential mobility of ions for separating complex sample mixtures prior to detection. To increase the resolving power, a dynamic microsolvation environment is often created by introducing solvent vapors. Here, relatively large clusters are formed at low-field conditions which then evaporate to form smaller clusters at high-field conditions. The kinetics of these processes as the electrical field strength oscillates are not well studied. Here, we develop a computational framework to investigate how the different reactions (cluster association, cluster dissociation, and fast conformational changes) behave at different field strengths. We aim to better understand these processes, their effect on experimental outcomes, and whether DMS model accuracy is improved via incorporating their description. We find that cluster association and dissociation reactions for typical ion-solvent pairs are fast compared to the time scale of the varying separation fields usually used. However, low solvent concentration, small dipole moments, and strong ion-solvent binding can result in reaction rates small enough that a lag is observed in the ion's DMS response. This can yield differences of several volts in the compensation voltages required to correct ion trajectories for optimal transmission. We also find that the proposed kinetic approach yields generally better agreement with experiment than using a modified Boltzmann weighting scheme. Thus, this work provides insights into the chemical dynamics occurring within the DMS cell while also increasing the accuracy of dispersion plot predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".