Deep-Learning-Based Feature Extraction Approach for Significant Wave Height Prediction in SAR Mode Altimeter Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predicting sea wave parameters such as significant wave height (SWH) has recently been identified as a critical requirement for maritime security and economy. Earth observation satellite missions have resulted in a massive rise in marine data volume and dimensionality. Deep learning technologies have proven their capabilities to process large amounts of data, draw useful insights, and assist in environmental decision making. In this study, a new deep-learning-based hybrid feature selection approach is proposed for SWH prediction using satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) mode altimeter data. The introduced approach integrates the power of autoencoder deep neural networks in mapping input features into representative latent-space features with the feature selection power of the principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm to create significant features from altimeter observations. Several hybrid feature sets were generated using the proposed approach and utilized for modeling SWH using Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Neural Network Regression (NNR). SAR mode altimeter data from the Sentinel-3A mission calibrated by in situ buoy data was used for training and evaluating the SWH models. The significance of the autoencoder-based feature sets in improving the prediction performance of SWH models is investigated against original, traditionally selected, and hybrid features. The autoencoder–PCA hybrid feature set generated by the proposed approach recorded the lowest average RMSE values of 0.11069 for GPR models, which outperforms the state-of-the-art results. The findings of this study reveal the superiority of the autoencoder deep learning network in generating latent features that aid in improving the prediction performance of SWH models over traditional feature extraction methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".