MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308213293 · doi:10.4017/gt.2022.21.s.737.pp3

Technologies for health and wellness in later life

2022· article· en· W4308213293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontechnology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsFraser InstituteSimon Fraser University
FundersAGE-WELL
KeywordsRisk analysis (engineering)PsychologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Having a healthy lifestyle is important for developing and maintaining optimal health across the lifespan and can positively contribute to quality of life and reduced care dependency in later life AGE-WELL has identified Healthy Lifestyles and Wellness as one of its eight Challenge Areas for research and innovation in the AgeTech sector. Technology may improve health and wellbeing by enabling individuals to track, monitor, and manage their health behaviours. Digital tools (AgeTech) may help older adults remain socially, mentally, and physically active in the face of age-related cognitive and physical decline, but also help promote longevity and improve long-term health. Older adults also represent a growing segment of the burgeoning digital wellness industry, with the US senior market projected to reach $900 million by 2022 (Consumer Technology Association, 2019). Given the digital health and wellness market's growth trajectory and evidenced potential for technology in promoting physical and mental wellbeing in later life, there is a need to understand the key emerging trends and opportunities for AgeTech. This poster provides an overview of initial work in the Challenge Area being led by a team at the STAR Institute at Simon Fraser University and outlines future directions for AGE-WELL's research and innovation agenda. Method An environmental scan The environmental scan draws on academic articles, grey literature, targeted organization websites, and internet searches, to identify digital products, projects, policies, and initiatives that promote the key domains of healthy aging: physical, social, cognitive, and mental wellbeing. Analysis of trends utilizes the PESTEL framework (political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors) to explore the forces driving or restricting innovation in the use of AgeTech to support healthy lifestyles and aging. Results and Discussion Preliminary results from the environmental scan demonstrate how technology can play an important role in supporting individuals to adopt and maintain healthy lifestyle behaviours and live an engaged and meaningful life. Current and emerging technologies address multiple health domains such as physical and social health outcomes. Despite increased demand from older adults for health and wellness technologies, there are limited age-specific solutions to support healthy aging. Although many commercially available products identified were not specifically designed for older adults, they incorporated features that may promote healthy lifestyles in later life. While there are an increasing number of health and wellness technologies aimed at the senior market, many of these digital solutions are targeted at those with reduced cognitive and physical functioning rather than the 'healthy old'. There is a need to prioritize AgeTech solutions which focus on this growing market. The results of the environmental scan will provide the basis for research and innovation activities in AgeTech for healthy lifestyles and wellness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it