MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308222673 · doi:10.1145/3536221.3558068

Exemplar-based Stylized Gesture Generation from Speech: An Entry to the GENEA Challenge 2022

2022· article· en· W4308222673 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Ghorbani, Ylva Ferstl, Marc‐André Carbonneau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsUbisoft (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceStylized factAnimationMotion (physics)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkComputer visionComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present our entry to the GENEA Challenge of 2022 on data-driven co-speech gesture generation. Our system is a neural network that generates gesture animation from an input audio file. The motion style generated by the model is extracted from an exemplar motion clip. Style is embedded in a latent space using a variational framework. This architecture allows for generating in styles unseen during training. Moreover, the probabilistic nature of our variational framework furthermore enables the generation of a variety of outputs given the same input, addressing the stochastic nature of gesture motion. The GENEA challenge evaluation showed that our model produces full-body motion with highly competitive levels of human-likeness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207