MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308224179 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2022.3210229

Deep Neural Networks for Rapid Simulation of Planar Microwave Circuits Based on Their Layouts

2022· article· en· W4308224179 on OpenAlexafffund
Shutong Qi, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkElectronic circuitPlanarArtificial neural networkMicrowaveElectronic engineeringParameterized complexityIntegrated circuitDeep learningScattering parametersTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article demonstrates a deep learning (DL)-based methodology for the rapid simulation of planar microwave circuits based on their layouts. We train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to compute the scattering parameters of general, two-port circuits consisting of a metallization layer printed on a grounded dielectric substrate, by processing the metallization pattern along with the thickness and dielectric permittivity of the substrate. This approach harnesses the efficiency of CNNs with pattern recognition tasks and extends previous efforts to employ neural networks for the simulation of parameterized circuit geometries. Furthermore, we integrate this CNN in a hybrid network with a long-short term memory (LSTM) module that uses coarse mesh finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation data as an additional input. We show that this hybrid network is computationally efficient and generalizable, accurately modeling geometries well beyond those that the network has previously seen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207