MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308319097 · doi:10.12692/ijb/21.4.11-17

Knowledge of breast feeding practices for infants from 0 to 6 months in the commune of Yopougon (Abidjan, Cote Divoire)

2022· article· en· W4308319097 on OpenAlexaff
Adepo Yapo Prosper, Soro Soronikpoho, Touzou Bléou, Koffi Claude Alain Kouadio, Kati-Coulibaly Séraphin, Mouroufie Akj, Kouakou Ekv, Kouakou Fk, Tanoh Fe, Kouakou Ac, Kamara Konan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biosciences (IJB) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To get breastfeeding mothers to adhere to the practice of exclusive breastfeeding of infants from 0 to 6 months, it is necessary to understand the difficulties underlying this practice.This study aims to identify the difficulties related to the practice of exclusive breastfeeding of infants from birth to 6 months because of sustainable solutions for its implementation.During a survey, it was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study that took place on a sample of 200 women.The locality of the survey is the commune of Yopougon and the period indicated extends from October 07, 2020 to February 07, 2021.After investigation, it appears that the difficulties relating to the decline in exclusive breastfeeding are linked to the insufficient production of breast milk, fatigue, the daily occupation of the mother, pain and cracks in the nipple, stress, the precarious state of health of the mother and the atrophy of the udders.The provision of a sustainable joint solution in the form of recommendations relating to the difficulties listed will make it possible to achieve the millennium objective of the WHO and UNICEF which is to exclusively breastfeed infants from 0 to 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biosciences (IJB)Same topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207