MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308320708 · doi:10.18433/jpps32921

Review of Pharmaceutical Applications of Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether

2022· review· en· W4308320708 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nastaran Hashemzadeh, Abolghasem Jouyban

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TabrizTabriz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsCosmeticsSolubilizationPulmonary surfactantSolventChemistrySolubilityDosage formDiethylene glycolChromatographyOrganic chemistryEthylene glycol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGME) is a hydroalcoholic solvent that gained tremendous attention in the cosmetics, food, nanoformulations, and pharmaceutical industries. Due to its physicochemical features, it has been widely used as a penetration enhancer, surfactant, and solubilizer. Among numerous tradenames defined for DEGME -- Carbitol® (by Dow Chemical Co., USA), and Transcutol® HP, CG, and P. (by Gattefossé Co., France) -- are known to be employed in pharmaceutical industries. Transcutol® CG is utilized only in cosmetics; however, Transcutol® P and Carbitol® are both used in various pharmaceutical topical dosage forms such as creams, gels, etc. Additionally, Transcutol® HP is used in all administration routes. In view of this, the application of DEGME is highlighted in the areas of industry and pharmaceutical sciences. Moreover, in this review the prominent characteristics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of DEGME are examined and it is suggested that DEGME is a promising solvent/solubilizer with comparable assignments to other conventional excipients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207