MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308342017 · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.055203

High-current space-charge-limited pulses using ultrashort laser pulses

2022· article· en· W4308342017 on OpenAlexafffund
Channprit Kaur, Karumudi Rambabu, R. Fedosejevs

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsOpticsSpace chargePulse durationElectromagnetic pulseDiodePulse (music)PhotocathodeLaserCurrent densitySaturation currentMultiphoton intrapulse interference phase scanUltrashort pulsePicosecondBandwidth-limited pulseMaterials scienceVoltageOptoelectronicsElectronDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The maximum current that can be delivered by a 1-D vacuum diode is limited due to the space-charge reduction of the accelerating field. For a steady-state operation, this is given by the Child-Langmuir space-charge limit. However, for pulsed diode sources, the instantaneous current can be much higher than this limit, as long as the pulse length is much less than the transit time across the diode gap. This enables the generation of high current pulses with pulse durations of the order of tens of picoseconds using photocathodes driven by ultrashort laser pulses. The generation of such short and powerful electromagnetic pulses is important for numerous applications such as ultrawideband radar or as photocathode sources for accelerators. In this work, the limiting current pulse is investigated in the case of a very short, square-top initial pulse and it is found that these pulses propagate in a self-similar manner, remaining as a square-top charge cloud in space throughout their acceleration and propagation. The resultant current and pulse duration turn out to be dependent on only three parameters, which are the applied voltage, the vacuum transit time, and the fraction of the saturation charge density in the initial charge cloud. The resultant scaling of the resultant peak current and pulse duration are calculated numerically as a function of starting sheet-charge density, allowing the calculation of the resultant pulses for any ultrashort, pulse-driven vacuum photodiode design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207