MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308342017 · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.055203

High-current space-charge-limited pulses using ultrashort laser pulses

2022· article· en· W4308342017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsOpticsSpace chargePulse durationElectromagnetic pulseDiodePulse (music)PhotocathodeLaserCurrent densitySaturation currentMultiphoton intrapulse interference phase scanUltrashort pulsePicosecondBandwidth-limited pulseMaterials scienceVoltageOptoelectronicsElectronDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The maximum current that can be delivered by a 1-D vacuum diode is limited due to the space-charge reduction of the accelerating field. For a steady-state operation, this is given by the Child-Langmuir space-charge limit. However, for pulsed diode sources, the instantaneous current can be much higher than this limit, as long as the pulse length is much less than the transit time across the diode gap. This enables the generation of high current pulses with pulse durations of the order of tens of picoseconds using photocathodes driven by ultrashort laser pulses. The generation of such short and powerful electromagnetic pulses is important for numerous applications such as ultrawideband radar or as photocathode sources for accelerators. In this work, the limiting current pulse is investigated in the case of a very short, square-top initial pulse and it is found that these pulses propagate in a self-similar manner, remaining as a square-top charge cloud in space throughout their acceleration and propagation. The resultant current and pulse duration turn out to be dependent on only three parameters, which are the applied voltage, the vacuum transit time, and the fraction of the saturation charge density in the initial charge cloud. The resultant scaling of the resultant peak current and pulse duration are calculated numerically as a function of starting sheet-charge density, allowing the calculation of the resultant pulses for any ultrashort, pulse-driven vacuum photodiode design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it