MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308348918 · doi:10.1002/inpr.116

Issue Information

2022· paratext· en· W4308348918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Craig Breheny, Kevin McPeake, Amy Miele, Danièlle Gunn‐Moore, Dan Lewis, Serena Bassolino, Chez de Oliveira, Sam Dixon, Stephen Baines, Aiden Foster, Gareth Hateley, Jo Defra, M. H. Hillyer, Equine Hospital, Ellie Mardell, Feline Better, Chester Ristic, Tracy Bainbridge, Park Group, Catriona Leicestershire, Peter Curtis, Somerset Anval, Catherine Manktelow, Cheshire Page, Steven Mcculloch, Malcolm Morley, Justine Shotton

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Practice · 2022
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationComputer scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Working globally: costs and considerations involved Ed Taylor OPINION Everyday ethics 557 Concerns about non-accidental injury in a Labrador retriever with a tibial fracture 559 Comments on: How should you respond when a client takes offence to one of your employee's social media posts?Off the record 560 Taking lessons from veterinary births 20427689,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8480.722

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIn PracticeSame topicMental Health via WritingFrench-language works237,207