Monotonic Quantile Network for Worst-Case Offline Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key challenge in offline reinforcement learning (RL) is how to ensure the learned offline policy is safe, especially in safety-critical domains. In this article, we focus on learning a distributional value function in offline RL and optimizing a worst-case criterion of returns. However, optimizing a distributional value function in offline RL can be hard, since the crossing quantile issue is serious, and the distribution shift problem needs to be addressed. To this end, we propose monotonic quantile network (MQN) with conservative quantile regression (CQR) for risk-averse policy learning. First, we propose an MQN to learn the distribution over returns with non-crossing guarantees of the quantiles. Then, we perform CQR by penalizing the quantile estimation for out-of-distribution (OOD) actions to address the distribution shift in offline RL. Finally, we learn a worst-case policy by optimizing the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of the distributional value function. Furthermore, we provide theoretical analysis of the fixed-point convergence in our method. We conduct experiments in both risk-neutral and risk-sensitive offline settings, and the results show that our method obtains safe and conservative behaviors in robotic locomotion tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".