MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308368567 · doi:10.1097/jfn.0000000000000419

Looking Forward to 2023

2022· editorial· en· W4308368567 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cindy Peternelj‐Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Forensic Nursing · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic nursingHealth sciencePsychologyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMedical educationEnvironmental healthMedicinePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author Affiliation: College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan. The author declares no conflict of interest. Correspondence: Cindy Peternelj-Taylor, RN, BScN, MSc, DF-IAFN, College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Health Science Building – 1A10, Box 6, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5E5. E-mail: [email protected].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Forensic NursingSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207