Machine learning based outcome prediction of large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation prior to thrombectomy in patients with wake-up stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Outcome prediction of large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation in patients with wake-up stroke is important to identify patients that will benefit from thrombectomy. Currently, mismatch concepts that require MRI or CT-Perfusion (CTP) are recommended to identify these patients. We evaluated machine learning algorithms in their ability to discriminate between patients with favorable (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6) outcome and between patients with poor (mRS5-6) and non-poor (mRS 0-4) outcome. METHODS: Data of 8395 patients that were treated between 2018 and 2020 from the nationwide registry of the German Society for Neuroradiology was retrospectively analyzed. Five models were trained with clinical variables and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). The model with the highest accuracy was validated with a test dataset with known stroke onset and with a test dataset that consisted only of wake-up strokes. RESULTS: 2419 patients showed poor and 3310 patients showed favorable outcome. The best performing Random Forest model achieved a sensitivity of 0.65, a specificity of 0.81 and an AUC of 0.79 on the test dataset of patients with wake-up stroke in the classification analysis between favorable and unfavorable outcome and a sensitivity of 0.42, a specificity of 0.83 and an AUC of 0.72 in the classification analysis between poor and non-poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms have the potential to aid in the decision making for thrombectomy in patients with wake-up stroke especially in hospitals, where emergency CTP or MRI imaging is not available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".