Electromagnetic Parametric Modeling Using Combined Neural Networks and RLGC-Based Eigenfunctions for Two-Port Microstrip Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a novel electromagnetic (EM) parametric modeling technique using combined neural networks and resistance, inductance, conductance, and capacitance (RLGC)-based eigenfunctions (neuro-EF) for microwave components with two-port microstrip structures. In the proposed technique, neural networks are used to learn the unknown relationship between the parameters of RLGC of the eigenfunction and geometrical parameters. The generation of training data depends on obtaining the correct eigenvalues of different modes. However, for different geometrical parameter samples, there is no uniform correspondence between the calculated eigenvalues and the modes. The incorrect correspondence may cause the two modes to be swapped, defined as the mode-swap issue. We propose a mode-matching method based on eigenvectors to solve this mode-swap issue. After the training data of eigenfunction parameters is obtained, a preliminary training of the neural networks and a two-step refinement training of the neuro-EF model are proposed to develop the overall EM parametric model. By the proposed modeling technique, the trained model can provide a fast and accurate prediction of EM responses for two-port microstrip structures as geometrical parameters change. For the parametric modeling of microwave components with microstrip structures, the proposed technique can obtain better accuracy in larger geometrical variations compared with the existing methods. Two examples of microstrip structures are used to illustrate the proposed technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".