MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptively Clock-boosted  Auto-ranging Neural-interface  for Emerging Neuromodulation Applications

2022· preprint· en· W4308406639 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Reza Pazhouhandeh, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Iliya Weisspapir, Peter L. Carlen, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationNeuromodulationLocal field potentialComputer scienceBrain–computer interfaceStimulationNeuroscienceElectroencephalographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Responsive deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires recruiting deep brain structures without affecting the superficial neuronal population. Neurosurgeons widely use implanted electrodes, which are highly localized but invasive, to stimulate the deep brain. Temporally interfering stimulation (TIS) excites the deep brain non-invasively. This neuromodulation technique utilizes two high-frequency sinusoidal electric fields that do not recruit superficial neural structures but have a small frequency differential. The small differential causes a low-frequency interference envelope that stimulates deep regions and is steerable by changing the intensity of the electric fields without physically moving the electrodes. Using TIS as a non-invasive DBS method generates high-frequency stimulation artifacts at recording sites, which may saturate a conventional recording front-end. This paper presents a low-power bidirectional 64-channel CMOS neural-ADC that is immune to artifacts such as those in the TIS techniques or conventional biphasic stimulation. The presented DC-coupled chopped analog front-end leverages delta-spectrum shaping to remove electrode DC offset voltage and maintain the input impedance higher than 250 MΩ, which is sufficient for interfacing with non-invasive scalp electrodes. The AFE operates on the input signal difference to detect large and rapid stimulation artifacts. It incorporates both exponential tracking and boosted-rate sampling to recover within 100 μs. Upon recovery, the neural-ADC range and speed are reduced to achieve noise and power efficiency factors of 2.98 and 10.6, respectively. In vivo recordings from anesthetized mice demonstrate the unique capabilities of the presented architecture in resolving local field potentials from the surface and epidural electrodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207