Experimental investigation of local chemo-mechanical behaviour and temporal development of osmotic consolidation in expansive clay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of one-dimensional cation infiltration tests under different drainage/infiltration conditions, infiltration times, ion concentrations (Na+), and vertical stresses were performed to comprehensively understand the osmotic consolidation of bentonite. The local behaviour of the specimen was captured on a digital camera through a transparent acrylic oedometer ring by tracking the movements of the marker sands on the side of the specimen. The Na+ concentration of the pore fluid throughout the specimen was measured after the test to investigate the spatiotemporal relationships between consolidation behaviour and cation infiltration. In the initial period of infiltration, the pore water pressure measured at the undrained bottom increased. A local swelling behaviour inside the specimen was observed during osmotic consolidation. The low permeability of expansive soils obstructs osmotically induced water drainage from the interlayer space of the expansive clay mineral, especially in regions far from the drainage boundary. This transition of pore water pressure affects the local mechanical behaviour; the dissipation of pore water pressure is followed by settlement. Therefore, the process of osmotic consolidation is totally longer than that of pure mechanical consolidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".