MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308438368 · doi:10.1063/5.0123259

Mean wake and aerodynamic forces for surface-mounted finite-height square prisms of very small aspect ratio

2022· article· en· W4308438368 on OpenAlexafffund
Bárbara L. da Silva, Dylan G. H. Hahn, David S. Sumner, Donald J. Bergstrom

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsWakePhysicsStrouhal numberReynolds numberDrag coefficientBoundary layerVorticityAerodynamic forceMechanicsPrismDragOpticsBoundary layer thicknessVortex sheddingAerodynamicsGeometryVortexTurbulenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mean flow field, aerodynamic forces, bending moment and Strouhal number (St) were investigated for isolated surface-mounted finite-height square prisms of very small aspect ratio (AR). The Reynolds number was Re =7.5×104 for the velocity measurements and 9×104 for the force, bending moment and St measurements. Prisms with AR = 0.5, 0.7 and 1 were considered, under two different boundary layer thicknesses of δ/D=0.7–0.8 (thin) and δ/D=1.3 (thick). For both boundary layers, the mean drag force coefficient showed a sharper increase with AR compared with taller prisms, and the mean normal force coefficient increased smoothly, with a lower magnitude than pressure-based normal force coefficients. An approximately constant point of action of the drag force was found for AR < 1. While the thick boundary layer caused the spectral peaks to weaken and St to decrease, some periodicity was still found for all AR. These features were connected to the changes in the mean wake of the prisms with AR and δ/D. A smaller AR and larger δ/D had similar effects, causing the wake to shorten, the probability and type of reattachment of the flow on the free end to change, and the mean wake structure to transition from a streamwise wake vorticity pattern to an inner vorticity pattern. The prism with AR = 1 showed a dipole wake structure similar to that of taller prisms, while the unique wake topology of prisms with AR < 1 was found to be responsible for the different force and St trends identified in this range of AR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207